Detection alone is not a strategy. The defensible response to generative AI in assessment is to design tasks that either render AI assistance irrelevant, or that explicitly incorporate AI use as a competency to be demonstrated and evaluated.
Poios provides three complementary capabilities. First, a risk analysis tool that scores any draft assessment for its vulnerability to AI-assisted completion, with specific findings and recommendations. Second, an alternative design generator that proposes oral, in-person, supervised, or scenario-anchored alternatives appropriate to the discipline. Third, a probabilistic detection layer for submitted work, used as a moderation aid rather than an autonomous accusation engine.
Detection is treated as an indicator for human review, never as evidence of misconduct.
What this service provides
Design risk scoring
Quantitative AI-vulnerability score for any draft assessment task.
Alternative generation
Discipline-aware suggestions for integrity-assured assessment redesign.
Detection-as-indicator
Probabilistic AI-content signals surfaced for marker review, never auto-actioned.
Policy alignment
Workflows aligned to TEQSA Guidance Note on Academic Integrity (2022).
Standards and frameworks
This service is engineered to satisfy specific Australian higher education regulatory and academic standards.
- HES Framework Standard 5.2
- TEQSA Guidance Note: Academic Integrity (2022)
- TEQSA Request for Information on Generative AI
Next service