Pre-delivery and post-delivery moderation is a TEQSA expectation but a procedurally weak point in many institutions. Email-based review, version sprawl across shared drives, and undocumented moderator decisions create real risk during external review.
Poios provides a structured moderation workflow with assigned roles, deadline management, comment threading anchored to specific assessment items, and an immutable record of every change accepted, rejected, or revised. Every moderation outcome is exportable as a single audit-ready artefact.
The system supports both pre-delivery moderation (validating an assessment before it goes to students) and post-delivery moderation (sample-based review of marked work to validate marker calibration).
What this service provides
Pre and post delivery
Both moderation modes supported with distinct workflows and panels.
Anchored comments
Moderator feedback is attached to specific items, not floating in email threads.
Version history
Every revision retained. Diff view between any two versions.
Panel management
Multi-moderator panels with consensus tracking and disagreement resolution.
Standards and frameworks
This service is engineered to satisfy specific Australian higher education regulatory and academic standards.
- HES Framework Standard 5.3 (Monitoring, Review and Improvement)
- TEQSA Guidance Note: Assessment